When people fall behind on paying their bills, they look for places to cut corners. They might ask questions like these:
A Missouri woman was awarded $83 million by a jury who found that she was wrongly harassed over a debt that she did not owe. The woman was taken to court by Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC after the company claimed that she had a past due credit card debt of $1,000. However, the debt actually belonged to a man in the same area with a similar name.
People in Minnesota who find themselves in a tenuous situation with debt are frequently targets of con artists who portray themselves as debt collection agencies or individuals who are authorized to collect debts. These con artists are putting new technology to use with the internet in garnering information about potential targets. They utilize that information to appear credible and get money.
Debt collectors who are contacting Minnesota residents may not use any false or misleading information to get a debtor to take action. For instance, a debt collector may not claim to be associated with any state or federal government entity. They may also not give misleading or false information regarding how much a debtor may owe or what actions may be taken if the debt is not repaid.
Some Minnesota residents feel harassed by third-party collectors who are attempting to collect a debt that was initially owed to the original creditor. The manner in which third-party collectors may try to do so is regulated by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act which places prohibitions on the collector engaging in certain acts.
In the pursuit to reestablish credit, an individual will most likely encounter a debt collection agency and be forced to interact with them. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ensures all citizens of Minnesota basic protections against potential creditor harassment and outlines what the government considers fair debt collection practices.
Some readers from Minnesota may wish to learn more about the actions available to unsecured debt collection agencies. Collection agencies working with a secured debt generally have the option of seizing assets such as homes in order to procure payment, but this option is not immediately available if the debt is unsecured. However, collection agencies working with unsecured debt may nevertheless be able to compel forfeiture in some cases.
When Minnesota residents deal with debt collectors, they are entitled to certain legal protections. Some people may assume that debt collectors routinely engage in harassment and threatening behavior. However, many of these behaviors are actually prohibited by law. The Federal Trade Commission uses the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to protect consumers from harassment by debt collectors. This Act applies to all kinds of debts, including credit card debt, medical payments and car loans. However, it does not apply to debts that are the result of operating a business.
Economic challenges for Minnesota residents can be frustrating, especially if the inability to keep up with bills results in a lawsuit being filed. Although dealing with a lawsuit may add even more stress to the situation, it is important to understand that ignoring it may only aggravate the situation further. It is important to respond to a suit promptly, observing dates specified in paperwork from the court.
If someone owes a creditor money, they may start receiving letters and phone calls from debt collectors. It is important to note that these collection agencies are required to abide by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which limits what they can and cannot do in the course of their attempts to have an individual repay a debt. Collection agencies are allowed to contact people through a variety of means, including in person and by phone, but when and how frequently is limited.